Recklessness criminal law essay

Although Emily never directly injured Taylor, a jury convicts her and an appellate court upholds her conviction. The court explains that a jury could have reasonably determined that Emily satisfied the criminal negligence standard, described as “aggravated, culpable, gross, or reckless  conduct that is such a departure from what would be the conduct of an ordinarily prudent or careful person under the same circumstances as to be incompatible with a proper regard for human life.” The court explains that criminal negligence occurs when a reasonable person in the defendant’s position would have been aware of the relevant risk, and that a jury could have considered the risk to Taylor obvious. ( People v. Valdez , 27 Cal. 4th 778 (2002).)

Recklessness criminal law essay

recklessness criminal law essay

Media:

recklessness criminal law essayrecklessness criminal law essayrecklessness criminal law essayrecklessness criminal law essay