Here is another example of a simple error of omission that could have been caught if the student had read the essay aloud or given it to a friend to read. The word "of" should be between "calculation" and "the." That one small error makes the entire sentence awkward and confusing. If the instructor has to reread the sentence to try to understand its meaning, the flow of the essay is interrupted. If this happens often enough in the essay, it gives an overall bad impression on what otherwise might be a very good paper in terms of research.
But perhaps the most annoying of all bad student essays, while not the most reprehensible, is the Bad Essay by the Talented Student. In exam conditions, this will appear in the psychotic handwriting which the young person sees as a badge of his or her genius. It will be peppered with personal anecdotes and/or quotes from texts not on the course, demonstrating that literature, for this student, has broken its academic banks and connected with his/her life – worse still, that the student cares . These are the essays in which a literary ambition, on the part of the essay-writer, is clearer than their level-headed appraisal of the writers under discussion. There will be weird rhetorical flourishes, puns, jokes and parenthetical remarks. Unfortunately, given the present-day opportunities to stay in education until advanced age, the writers of these essays will go on to do postgraduate work, during which time no one will be able to figure out what they’re so angry about. This mystery will remain unsolved until the student starts teaching and marking essays him/herself. At this point, the real danger of prolonged education becomes clear: eventually student-teachers are confronted by the fact that not everyone thinks the same way they do. Marking essays disrupts the necessary autism with which angry students construct all readers in their own image as the exemplary reader/writer, and with which they massively inflate the value of their own project. For not only do others hold contrary opinions, they don’t care . There’s just two or three weirdly angry people in the class ready to start the process all over again. In fact what you really learn is that you can’t really teach anyone at all: some teach themselves, the rest just ignore you.
Every writer currently employed at has at least 2 years of permanent writing expertise. We hire no hackworkers or undergraduates with poor writing skills. We provide only truly qualified help for students. Every single applicant we hire runs a series of tests checking both his working aptitude and personal qualities. It is not enough to write well to work with us. If one seeks the position at , he naturally has to be an easy-going and appealing personality.
As you can see, we pick out the staff very carefully in order to make your cooperation with us not only beneficial but pleasant as well!